This doesn't happen with the longer and very stiff Fujan. As I said before, I found that in some cases the Levitan was a couple of inches too short for stiff, jumpy pins-I found that in that case I would jump back and forth between too high and too low. The flex in these are obvious and detract from tuning. Again, please stay away from anything that uses the old-style Schaff/ hale type heads and tips. I think it's similar to the Classic, but a different finish, and much cheaper. If you only want to spend that much, take a look at the Levitan Utility model. Get something that will make it more pleasant. But too short, and does not do well on sticky pins. The Levitan Classic? Very lightweight, and stiffer. But would it make any sense for them to be on the market at this point? Yes, I know many reading this made an entire career on them. Any tennis players out there? Sure, Wimbeldon was won with heavy old wood rackets. In fact, I'd go so far as to say these are totally obsolete and should die a dignified death. Those old-style tips and heads are terrible, and they ship with a useless short 5-degree tip.
#Piano tuner tools for sale professional
The professional quality and industry-standard Schaff? Forget it. I wish I had saved myself the expense and gone for the Fujan from the start. I have three hammers-a top Schaff model, a Levitan Classic, and a new Fujan. You haven't said what your purpose is (professional, student, occasional), but you did say
0 kommentar(er)
